← Search

Heather Bratcher

Park City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 123W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heather Bratcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #4 Doubles · with Jackie Parker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Maria Brockbank / Lauren Annunziata
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · Torres Down the Line · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bratcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · Torres Down the Line · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Bratcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jocelyn Bennion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Jocelyn Bennion championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Park City MARC-Deb's Warriors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
78.6%
33W–9L · 62.9% of games
3.5
64%
48W–27L · 57.8% of games
4.0
55%
22W–18L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.9% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
38 matches
#1 Singles
11%
22 matches
#2 Singles
11%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova