← Search

Robyn Scharman

Sandy, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 118W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robyn Scharman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Pamela Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Heiden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Roggensack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Roggensack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Heiden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Heiden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Heiden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Jill Brown / Laura Nunnelly
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Sports Mall-Adams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 53% of games
4.0
71.9%
82W–32L · 56.4% of games
4.5
50%
12W–12L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams