← Search

Massae Sato MacIunas

Bountiful, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 109W–126L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Massae Sato MacIunas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history235 matches
L
Kristin Killian / Sandee Kozel
2026-09-01 · Gladiatrix · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianne Saibara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · Wooden Rackets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Wooden Rackets · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Wooden Rackets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lisa Caldwell / Mandy Berg
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Megan Connelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Rawstorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Rovelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Rovelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lois Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lois Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mithona Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
64.6%
42W–23L · 51.3% of games
4.5
39.6%
36W–55L · 46.8% of games
8.0
52%
13W–12L · 54.1% of games
9.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 40.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer