Teams

Liberty Park-Sterbenz/Pickett

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

18 players · average NTRP 4.30 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-30Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrianna Harris Rowland / Stacie Johnson vs Karin Smith / Jennifer Hathaway7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Donahue vs Katherine Rist4-6, 2-6
2026-05-28vs TorresWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Brianna Harris Rowland vs Cherstin Harris / Jennifer Soulier6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLize Guerin vs Sarah Meitler6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNittaya Phonharath vs Maribel Alvarez7-6, 6-2
2026-05-14vs Liberty Park-Wallace/KempLost 02
L#1 SinglesJamie Donahue vs Elaine Schnabel3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesNittaya Phonharath vs Celest Andrade4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrianna Harris Rowland / Lize Guerin vs Debra Rawlings / Janine Petersen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesLize Guerin / Casey Pickett vs Laura Savage / Susan Picou7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNittaya Phonharath vs Tressa Gilbert5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-23vs Liberty Park-Woodbury/MillerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrianna Harris Rowland / Stephanie Walzer vs Karina Herman / Dawn Volsch6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJamie Donahue vs Katie Leikin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-09vs TorresWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Brianna Harris Rowland vs Rachel Mcillece / Alexandra Spruill7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJamie Donahue vs Jennifer Soulier6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lisa Sterbenz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Stephanie Walzer
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.30
Patrice Duvernay
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.29
Brianna Harris Rowland
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.27
Lize Guerin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.14
Casey Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Bridget Chiazzese
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Nittaya Phonharath
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.04
Kala Riester
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 4
4.03
Stacie Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.00
Tracey Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.96
Heidi Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.92
Miranda Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Lisa Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Jamie Donahue
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.77
Massae Sato MacIunas
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Megan Connelly
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Valentine + Heidi Gordon3252% games+6.7% vs expected
Lisa Sterbenz + Patrice Duvernay4650% games+5.7% vs expected
Tracey Valentine + Patrice Duvernay31961% games+5.4% vs expected
Lisa Sterbenz + Casey Pickett16855% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Sterbenz + Heidi Gordon3350% games−2.1% vs expected
Massae Sato MacIunas + Megan Connelly16952% games−2.4% vs expected
Massae Sato MacIunas + Lisa Sterbenz1546% games−6.6% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Tracey Valentine3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Sterbenz
151W–143L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Stephanie Walzer
82W–43L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Patrice Duvernay
141W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Brianna Harris Rowland
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Lize Guerin
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
4.27
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–133L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Bridget Chiazzese
83W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
Nittaya Phonharath
72W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Kala Riester
98W–23L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
Stacie Johnson
102W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Tracey Valentine
95W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Heidi Gordon
98W–95L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Miranda Edwards
45W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Lisa Park
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Jamie Donahue
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Massae Sato MacIunas
106W–120L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Megan Connelly
46W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.