← Search

Kristin Killian

Park City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 122W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristin Killian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-09-03 · PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · PC MARC- Après Tennis Club · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-27 · PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Susel Weight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Faith Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charlotte Trahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Nunnelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.8%
43W–13L · 64.5% of games
4.0
64.6%
53W–29L · 56.7% of games
8.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.4% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams