← Search

Faith Petersen

Park City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 101W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Faith Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
Nicole Chase
2026-09-01 · PC MARC- Après Tennis Club · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Killian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandee Kozel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-16 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
55.3%
99W–80L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 56% of the time
#1 Singles
56%
103 matches
#2 Singles
14%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal