← Search

Rachel Labrum

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
144 matches · 89W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Heber City · 4.0
3 of 7
UT · 4.0
40 of 164
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Rachel is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rachel has gone from the 52nd to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.0
61.8%
76W–47L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history144 matches
W
Sharlene Enloe / Heather Allen
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Reese
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-4
W
Debi Johnson / DeeAnn Henderson
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Kat Fuller / Sonja Blackham
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ziebarth
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
+0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Renee Utgaard / Miglena Aaron
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clark
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Tara Wood / Lisa Beames
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
−0.008about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Lori Curtis / AnnMarie Chadwick
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 4-2
W
Lisa Bullington / Lori Murdock
2026-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Reese
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Linda Fillmore / Michelle Hansen
2025-12-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ziebarth
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-0
L
Renee Utgaard / Susan Nelson
2025-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.