← Search

Rachel Labrum

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 94W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Labrum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Rina Benson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ziebarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-05 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
W
2026-02-12 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-29 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-18 · Heber Valley-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ziebarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
60.9%
81W–52L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova