← Search

Anna Ziebarth

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 20W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Anna Ziebarth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-08-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-21 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deyce Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Faith Petersen / Sandee Kozel
2026-02-05 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-29 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
W
2025-12-18 · Heber Valley-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 53.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#1 Singles
16%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe