← Search

Jennifer Stringham

Provo, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 125W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Stringham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
L
2026-08-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with AnnMarie Chadwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · #3 Doubles · with Kristi Parker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with AnnMarie Chadwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Janine Nemelka / Debra Knowlton
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raquel Westover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Cronquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60.6%
100W–65L · 54.2% of games
4.0
22%
13W–46L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
50 matches
#1 Singles
9%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer