← Search

Angie Neuberger

HEBER CITY, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 77W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angie Neuberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Heber Volley Gals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Probst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Eagleridge-Halls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Tagge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Eagleridge-Halls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Mithona Nielsen / Erin Bradley
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Mills championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · Eagleridge-Halls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Tagge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 59.5% of games
4.0
49.2%
59W–61L · 51.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert