← Search

Mithona Nielsen

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 114W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mithona Nielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
W
2026-09-11 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rawley Nielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Zarbock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Kelley Epstein / Jennifer Johnson
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Bleak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyler Waltman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 51.8% of games
3.5
45.9%
28W–33L · 48.3% of games
4.0
52.1%
50W–46L · 51.1% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#1 Singles
23%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
35 matches
#2 Singles
8%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams