← Search

Tiffany Zarbock

Draper, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 166W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Zarbock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
W
Sharlene Enloe / Nicole Miller
2026-09-10 · Sports Mall-No Love Lost · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-21 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zak Zarbock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Bradley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zak Zarbock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mithona Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Maughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-07-10 · SM- I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rawley Nielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-26 · SM- I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rawley Nielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Waltman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 50.9% of games
3.0
58.7%
27W–19L · 54.7% of games
3.5
76.8%
43W–13L · 60.1% of games
4.0
61.2%
63W–40L · 56.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.4% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
45 matches
#1 Singles
13%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King