← Search

Jacki Joseph

Ogden, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
400 matches · 234W–166L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jacki Joseph to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history400 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Pizza 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · Pizza 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Pizza 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Sara Green championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Robin Simmons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanette Shepard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-17 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tomas Barrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Christy Owens / Amy Black
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
65.2%
30W–16L · 57.1% of games
3.5
64.3%
99W–55L · 55.7% of games
4.0
39.8%
37W–56L · 47.1% of games
7.0
73%
27W–10L · 60.6% of games
8.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 51.4% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
135 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
103 matches
#1 Singles
5%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert