← Search

Kathy Miller-Rees

Ogden, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 150W–147L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kathy Miller-Rees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history297 matches
W
2026-08-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacki Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacki Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacki Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacki Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Amy Black / Jane McQuade
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carlene Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
62%
49W–30L · 54.5% of games
4.5
38.4%
38W–61L · 46.6% of games
8.0
81.8%
27W–6L · 63.5% of games
9.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 37.6% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.5% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 17.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
90 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer