← Search

Carlene Kemp

Layton, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
253 matches · 58W–195L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carlene Kemp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history253 matches
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Staci McCubbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Despain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Staci McCubbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Liberty Park-Woodbury · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
25.7%
46W–133L · 41.7% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 39.7% of games
9.0
0%
0W–12L · 30.6% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.7% of games
8.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer