← Search

Melissa Despain

HIGHLAND, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 174W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melissa Despain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
W
Trisha Cutrer / Amy Black
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Tammie Pearson / Chieko Perry
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carlene Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kala Riester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ladawn Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Utgaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.3%
33W–20L · 54% of games
3.5
67.9%
72W–34L · 56.8% of games
4.0
58.5%
62W–44L · 52.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.7% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe