Teams

Liberty Park-Hurd/Maxfield

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Daisy Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.81
Kristi Warren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.76
Angela Bleak
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.74
Kim Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.69
Chandi Hurd
published 4
3.68
Misty Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.65
Teri Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.62
Annette Knight
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Sarah Love
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.57
Jennifer Sampson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.44
Jacki Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.40
Jeanette Shepard
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Michelle Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Debra Knowlton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Sara Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanette Shepard + Jacki Joseph2651% games+7.3% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Michelle Maxfield281656% games+5.8% vs expected
Michelle Maxfield + Chandi Hurd28859% games+5.5% vs expected
Sarah Love + Michelle Maxfield5453% games+4.1% vs expected
Jennifer Sampson + Debra Knowlton15658% games+2.5% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Angela Bleak71147% games+2.3% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Chandi Hurd161256% games+2.2% vs expected
Kristi Warren + Sarah Love7254% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daisy Carlson
185W–93L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Kristi Warren
242W–134L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Kim Cronin
380W–237L career · 15 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Chandi Hurd
180W–143L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Misty Morrow
79W–60L career · 9 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Teri Bishop
181W–151L career · 10 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
Sarah Love
197W–133L career · 7 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Jennifer Sampson
209W–141L career · 8 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jacki Joseph
223W–156L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Michelle Maxfield
206W–139L career · 8 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Debra Knowlton
170W–137L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Sara Green
32W–76L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.