Teams

SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS

2026 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 4.5 WOMEN+

14 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Daria Shalina
published 4.5
4.23
Chelsea Loomis
published 4.5
4.18
Elise Altfas
published
4.11
Sara Altfas
published 4.5
4.02
4.00
Jennifer Cerny
published 4
3.99
Karin Fuire
published 4.5
3.92
Betsy Pettet
published 4
3.87
Lindsey Lanni
published 4
3.81
Amanda Zommick
published 4
3.79
Mary McNulty
published
3.74
Tricia Miller
published
3.73
Mia Hatfield
published
Tiffany Theophil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary McNulty + Lindsey Lanni5263% games+17.5% vs expected
Tricia Miller + Katelyn McCullough5259% games+9.3% vs expected
Chelsea Loomis + Katelyn McCullough3254% games+5.7% vs expected
Katelyn McCullough + Lindsey Lanni442955% games+3.7% vs expected
Tricia Miller + Karin Fuire22958% games+2.7% vs expected
Betsy Pettet + Amanda Zommick311260% games+2.2% vs expected
Betsy Pettet + Mary McNulty383250% games−0.0% vs expected
Amanda Zommick + Lindsey Lanni4454% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daria Shalina
9W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Chelsea Loomis
48W–64L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Elise Altfas
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Sara Altfas
35W–32L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
4
Katelyn McCullough
181W–121L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Jennifer Cerny
235W–139L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4.5
Karin Fuire
81W–47L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Betsy Pettet
158W–107L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Lindsey Lanni
187W–125L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Amanda Zommick
263W–134L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Mary McNulty
160W–99L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Tricia Miller
217W–124L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Mia Hatfield
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Tiffany Theophil
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.