← Search

Tina Marriott

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 40W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tina Marriott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Chieko Perry / Kristin Baker
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Torres · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · Torres · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Hofmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · Day Dream Believers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-22 · Day Dream Believers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
L
2025-11-15 · Day Dream Believers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeeAnn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-11 · Day Dream Believers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · Day Dream Believers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Pfister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
55.2%
32W–26L · 51% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova