← Search

Regan Tieff

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 197W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Regan Tieff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
W
2026-08-28 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sawyer Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Powell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Asaf Vos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Eccles-Tieff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Eccles-Tieff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Powell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Heather Evans / Meghan Tuohig
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Becky Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
Katie Zimmerman / Kristi Roggensack
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Powell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Eccles-Tieff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Becky Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Eccles-Tieff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sidney van Tussenbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · SM- Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Asaf Vos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.5
64.2%
34W–19L · 57% of games
4.0
63.9%
69W–39L · 57.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.3% of games
7.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 48.8% of games
8.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
66 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer