← Search

Janelle Pulley

Farmington, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 77W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janelle Pulley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Cottonwood Club-Briesacher · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Cottonwood Club-Briesacher · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Brockbank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Cottonwood Club-Briesacher · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Cottonwood Club-Briesacher · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Pizza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · LP- BD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Son mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · LP- BD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nateenond Supatpitak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-17 · LP- BD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Son mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-18 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Annunziata · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haley H Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-04 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Annunziata · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-20 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Annunziata · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Briesacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
66.1%
41W–21L · 54.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 32.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
8.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 53.9% of games
8.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 55.2% of games
9.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal