Search

Sara Turley

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 45W–53L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Salt Lake City · 3.0
23 of 29
UT · 3.0
91 of 109
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Sara is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sara has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sara has gone from the 21st to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 58.9% of games
3.0
43.1%
28W–37L · 48% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 39.6% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.8% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Krejci
+0.041better than expected — took 53% of games against 36% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kelly Singer / Melissa Holyoak
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Krejci
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-1
L
Paulette Santiago / Jennifer Lopez Monsalve
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelya Freed
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Krejci
+0.022better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Laurie Lewis / Krista Stewart
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Weaver
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Stephanie Webb
2026-06-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
L
Diana Vogel / Nancy Matz
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Tate
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-0
L
Chelsea Watts / Chelsie Otteson
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ricker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-26 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.035better than expected — took 41% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Child
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Jenna DeLong / Shana Seely
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Roeder
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Tiffany VandenAkker / Brooke Iverson
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.