← Search

Sara Turley

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 45W–60L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sara Turley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tam Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Susan Knust / Melissa Smith
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Cottonwood Club-Nielsen/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelya Freed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 56.2% of games
3.0
43.5%
30W–39L · 48.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 37.7% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe