← Search

Carla Stoddard

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 124W–150L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carla Stoddard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilee Cracroft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-29 · Trentman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Sharree Olsen / Karen Finger
2026-08-28 · Ageless Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-25 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Miya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Trentman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilee Cracroft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.1%
71W–83L · 47.6% of games
4.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 45.7% of games
7.0
50%
25W–25L · 49.2% of games
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
66 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer