← Search

Marilee Cracroft

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 56W–131L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marilee Cracroft to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Travers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-25 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Harris-Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Fredrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · SLTHC Ball Babes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · Drop Shot Divas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hannah Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-05 · SLTHC Spring Chicks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Carlston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · SLTHC Spring Chicks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Harris-Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
31.2%
39W–86L · 42.8% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 37.8% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 51% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–8L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
17 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer