← Search

Marilee Cracroft

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
150 matches · 46W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
42%
stay 3.0
58%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 81% stay · 19% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.93. Lower than today’s 3.02 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Salt Lake City · 3.0
12 of 29
UT · 3.0
45 of 109
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Marilee is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marilee has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Marilee has gone from the 23rd to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
30%
30W–70L · 42.6% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
4W–12L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 51% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
−0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Robin Simmons / Bessy Nielson
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Parker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Karen Wilson / Jeanette Shepard
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Parker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
Traci Wood / Kristel Affleck
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Harris-Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-0
L
Laurie Lewis / Cyndi Madsen
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Fredrickson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Cook / Rachelle Lee
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Gonzalez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
L
Debra Knowlton / Yoko Walljasper
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hannah Lee
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
W
Jennifer Stringham / Kristi Parker
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Carlston
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Harris-Johnson
−0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jamie Harris / Kate Stalsberg
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stoddard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Lindy Parks / Michelle Lynn Maxfield
2026-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandra Gonzalez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 2-3, 1-0
L
Nancy Matz / Michael Keoughmixed
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Beatty
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.