← Search

Cyndi Madsen

Orem, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 122W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cyndi Madsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-08-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherylin Winkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Linda Lasater / Katie Murphy
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Raquel Moss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with DeeAnn Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raquel Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raquel Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DeeAnn Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DeeAnn Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.7%
64W–51L · 53.3% of games
3.5
27.7%
28W–73L · 42.2% of games
6.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 68.5% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
18 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe