← Search

Kyoko Jensen

Lehi, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 103W–119L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kyoko Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · Ivory Ridge- Deucebags · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffon Winsor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Ivory Ridge- Deucebags · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffon Winsor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · #4 Doubles · with Jamie Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Jamie Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Ivory Ridge- Deucebags · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffon Winsor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Summer Borla championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Summer Borla championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharilee Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.7% of games
3.0
50.9%
57W–55L · 53% of games
3.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.1% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50.6% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe