Teams

Kiss My Ace

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPorsche Gardner / Shawna Smart vs Melanie Schlachter / Romina Fabiani5-7, 3-6
2026-07-29vs SunPro Lucky ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharilee Hill / Porsche Gardner vs Carrie Jensen / Suzette Greer6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Rozsa vs Natali King6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBritta Davis / Shawna Smart vs Shirley Johnson / Christina Marshall6-4, 7-5
2026-07-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Rozsa / Sharilee Hill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPorsche Gardner / Britta Davis vs Maria Pettit / Caryl Fletcher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-08vs Ivory Ridge RacquettesLost 02
L#1 DoublesPorsche Gardner / Shawna Smart vs Risa Karras / Kristi Winder2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Rozsa vs Ashlee Rees1-6, 2-6
2026-07-01vs PC MARC-SchlachterWon 10
W#2 DoublesShawna Smart / Porsche Gardner vs Lauren Karr / Lisa Graveline2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs SunPro Lucky ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKarla Block / Karen Rozsa vs Stacy Nadauld / Megan Cochran6-4, 6-2
2026-06-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Rozsa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Kyoko Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Jennifer Sweat
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.79
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.79
Sharilee Hill
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.77
Karen Rozsa
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Courtney Archibald
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.77
Marni Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carrie Larsen
published 3
2.73
Porsche Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Britta Davis
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.65
Shawna Smart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Karla Block
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Emily Matheson
published
Jamie Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawna Smart + Naomi Stroud-Peterson10652% games+11.4% vs expected
Courtney Archibald + Sharilee Hill6156% games+8.7% vs expected
Jennifer Sweat + Naomi Stroud-Peterson6652% games+6.9% vs expected
Karen Rozsa + Jennifer Sweat3263% games+3.9% vs expected
Jennifer Sweat + Sharilee Hill5161% games+2.5% vs expected
Naomi Stroud-Peterson + Emily Matheson81741% games−3.0% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Emily Matheson1439% games−9.1% vs expected
Britta Davis + Courtney Archibald2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kyoko Jensen
102W–118L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jennifer Sweat
136W–130L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
139W–157L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Sharilee Hill
73W–68L career · 15 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Karen Rozsa
187W–205L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Courtney Archibald
46W–55L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Marni Larsen
2W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77
3
Carrie Larsen
49W–46L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Porsche Gardner
33W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Britta Davis
36W–43L career · 10 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Shawna Smart
107W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Emily Matheson
53W–65L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Harris
21W–71L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.