Teams

Ivory Ridge- Deucebags

2026 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 6.5 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.19 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-09-05vs Liberty Park-WrightLost 12
L#1 DoublesYolanda Morris / Shane Hanks vs Fletcher Miller / Haley Swan1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Fronckowiak / Jamie Harris vs Stacia Carroll / Logan Cole7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristy Denney / John Denney vs Amy Dominguez / Daniel Ramirez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-21vs Liberty Park-WrightSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYolanda Morris / Shane Hanks vs Petar Mijic / Miranda Tilley6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyoko Jensen / Griffon Winsor vs Jessica Eckert / Logan Cole5-7, 4-6
2026-08-14vs SLTHC- HaroldsenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Harris / John Fronckowiak vs Gabriella Romney / Jesse Gordon6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Money / Nathan Money vs Candace Haroldsen / Cody Haroldsen6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKyoko Jensen / Griffon Winsor vs Nicole Chase / Ryan Dinapoli2-6, 4-6
2026-08-07vs Torres-tial SmashLost 03
L#1 DoublesShane Hanks / Yolanda Morris vs Michael Isaza / Hailey Mann1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGriffon Winsor / Kyoko Jensen vs Jesse Lambert / Rachael Gilmore0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Lacey / Diana Lacey vs Elaine Day / Austin Galura3-6, 2-6
2026-07-17vs LP- ATPLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Denney / Christy Denney vs Antonio Montes De Oca / Heather Ciriello6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJamie Harris / John Fronckowiak vs Nguyen Thai / Bernadette Muniz2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShane Hanks / Laura Money vs Arnel Cruz / April Woo2-6, 2-6
2026-07-10vs SM- Henderson/ArunLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Money / Nathan Money vs Brent Li / Laura Needham0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYolanda Morris / Shane Hanks vs Yoko Walljasper / Dylan Richardson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Denney / John Denney vs Karthik Kasiviswanathan / Abigail Lovestrand4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-26vs LP- TBHWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Fronckowiak / Jamie Harris vs Mary Sorensen / Ryan Graham4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Denney / John Denney vs Cj Haynes / Linda Lasater6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Money / Nathan Money vs Jennie Stacey / Sejong Lee6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · mixed 6.5 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Torres-tial Smash4111410121
2LP- ATP317512109
3SLTHC- Haroldsen135717116
4Ivory Ridge- Deucebags134817113
5LP- TBH1441125162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
John Denney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Nathan Money
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Yolanda Morris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
John Fronckowiak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Griffon Winsor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Kyoko Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Diana Lacey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jamie Harris
published 3
2.75
Shane Hanks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Christy Denney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.35
Laura Money
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Lacey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yolanda Morris + Shane Hanks134 matchesnot enough data
Christy Denney + John Denney224 matchesnot enough data
Griffon Winsor + Kyoko Jensen033 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Money + Laura Money213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Denney
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Nathan Money
7W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Yolanda Morris
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
John Fronckowiak
6W–6L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Griffon Winsor
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Kyoko Jensen
102W–119L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Diana Lacey
41W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jamie Harris
12W–55L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Shane Hanks
18W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christy Denney
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Laura Money
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Michael Lacey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.