← Search

Sabina Boies

Heber City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 34W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sabina Boies to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
Kyoko Jensen / Jamie Harris
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Finlayson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · Heber Volley Gals · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nike Hawkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathey Maxfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Finlayson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · Wasatch High School-Davis/Watts · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · Wasatch High School-Davis/Watts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Otteson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 78% of games
3.0
46.9%
23W–26L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal