Teams

SunPro Smashers

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs Cottonwood Club-Winson/SummerhaysLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenni Warner / Diane Heaps vs Lindy Parks / Alison Pearce6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherston Faux / Kaylene Andrew vs Camille Weaver / Rebecca England2-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs SLTHC Ball BabesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Heaps / Jenni Warner vs Marilee Cracroft / Carla Stoddard6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesShannon Fredericks vs Alejandra Gonzalez1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Edwards / Kaylene Andrew vs Heather Callister / Kelly Singer6-0, 7-5
2026-07-21vs Sports Mall-Knowlton/LakeLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Heaps / Julie Edwards vs Yoko Walljasper / Kimberly Holmstrom7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaylene Andrew / Lori Curtis vs Carolee Romney / Susan Knight6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Red Ledges-Christensen/ThomsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesShannon Fredericks vs Joyce Krawiecki6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaylene Andrew / Kelly Mortensen vs Annabelle Lang / Gail Levee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-07vs Ladies In BlackLost 13
L#1 DoublesDiane Heaps / Julie Edwards vs Angela Woods / Ashlee Chappell1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Fredericks vs Elizabeth Lohner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSherston Faux / Kaylene Andrew vs Kelli Lowell / Lisa Michie3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Lewis / Cyndi Madsen vs Stephanie Webb / Andrea Cook3-6, 3-6
2026-06-30vs Cottonwood Club-Winson/SummerhaysWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatrina Harlan / Jenni Warner vs Krissie Summerhays / Alison Pearce6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lewis / Krista Stewart vs Sara Turley / Camille Weaver6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs SLTHC Ball BabesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Heaps / Julie Edwards vs Elizabeth Harris-Johnson / Nancy Sparrer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Lewis / Cyndi Madsen vs Marilee Cracroft / Courtney Fredrickson6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-16vs Sports Mall-Knowlton/LakeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKelly Mortensen / Diane Heaps vs Carolee Romney / Kathryn Tagge2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherston Faux / Shannon Fredericks vs Kristel Affleck / Rebecca Myers2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Katrina Harlan
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.35
Carolyn Barber
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Raquel Westover
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.20
Diane Heaps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelly Mortensen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Jenni Warner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Shannon Fredericks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Lori Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Cherylin Winkel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Krista Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Sherston Faux
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Laurie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Cyndi Madsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Julie Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Stewart + Diane Heaps4655% games+13.7% vs expected
Laurie Lewis + Krista Stewart6255% games+6.3% vs expected
Cyndi Madsen + Cherylin Winkel13859% games+4.6% vs expected
Kaylene Andrew + Krista Stewart2643% games+3.6% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Diane Heaps10657% games+2.1% vs expected
Jenni Warner + Sherston Faux4348% games+1.1% vs expected
Laurie Lewis + Diane Heaps51243% games+0.3% vs expected
Kelly Mortensen + Carolyn Barber18855% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrina Harlan
127W–128L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Barber
88W–75L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Raquel Westover
113W–129L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Diane Heaps
92W–121L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Mortensen
110W–103L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kaylene Andrew
48W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Jenni Warner
61W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Shannon Fredericks
89W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · 10 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · 6 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Krista Stewart
27W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · 9 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laurie Lewis
40W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Cyndi Madsen
120W–134L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Julie Edwards
36W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.