Teams

Sports Mall-Knowlton/Lake

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-04vs SLTHC Ball BabesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBetty Peterson vs Alejandra Gonzalez2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Knight / Carolee Romney vs Elizabeth Harris-Johnson / Francie Peters7-5, 7-5
2026-07-28vs Red Ledges-Christensen/ThomsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesTraci Wood vs Courtney Archibald7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngelica Urquia / Danna Miller vs Stacy Braverman / Mary Harrison6-1, 6-2
2026-07-21vs SunPro SmashersWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarolee Romney / Susan Knight vs Kaylene Andrew / Lori Curtis1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-14vs Ladies In BlackLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolee Romney / Betty Peterson vs Kelli Lowell / Lanie Wilkinson2-6, 4-6
2026-06-30vs SLTHC Ball BabesWon 20
W#2 DoublesYoko Walljasper / Betty Peterson vs Angela Rasmussen / Carla Stoddard6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTraci Wood / Kristel Affleck vs Elizabeth Harris-Johnson / Marilee Cracroft6-3, 6-0
2026-06-23vs Red Ledges-Christensen/ThomsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTraci Wood / Danna Miller vs Annabelle Lang / Clarissa McLeod6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Knight / Betty Peterson vs Rhonda Taubin / Melissa Smith2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-16vs SunPro SmashersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTraci Wood / Danna Miller vs Katrina Harlan / Lori Curtis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarolee Romney / Kathryn Tagge vs Kelly Mortensen / Diane Heaps6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Angelica Urquia
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.39
Rachel Mills
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.33
Debra Knowlton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Traci Wood
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Carolee Romney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Myers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Lisa Beames
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Yoko Walljasper
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.19
Kathryn Tagge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.17
Betty Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Claudine Finlay
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Stacy Criddle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.10
Danna Miller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Holmstrom
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Shauna Lake
published
Susan Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Beames + Rebecca Myers4163% games+12.9% vs expected
Rebecca Myers + Angelica Urquia8167% games+10.8% vs expected
Danna Miller + Traci Wood12261% games+9.4% vs expected
Kimberly Holmstrom + Stacy Criddle4154% games+4.5% vs expected
Kristel Affleck + Debra Knowlton4452% games+4.4% vs expected
Stacy Criddle + Yoko Walljasper5163% games+3.3% vs expected
Kristel Affleck + Angelica Urquia5455% games+3.3% vs expected
Stacy Criddle + Debra Knowlton634553% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelica Urquia
53W–22L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Rachel Mills
77W–100L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Debra Knowlton
169W–137L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Traci Wood
37W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carolee Romney
134W–164L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Rebecca Myers
111W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Beames
158W–139L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Yoko Walljasper
308W–196L career · 12 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Kathryn Tagge
51W–101L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Claudine Finlay
195W–193L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Stacy Criddle
154W–122L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 10 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Danna Miller
108W–117L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Kimberly Holmstrom
49W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Shauna Lake
135W–130L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Knight
21W–58L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.