← Search

Yoko Walljasper

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
505 matches · 308W–197L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yoko Walljasper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history505 matches
L
2026-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Mills championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tomas Barrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristel Affleck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Jeanette Shepard / Karen Wilson
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Debra Knowlton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teren Taniuchi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Knowlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindi Paskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Holmstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dylan Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Utah/Affleck/55&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Michie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams110 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.5% of games
2.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 58.8% of games
3.0
60.2%
59W–39L · 53.9% of games
3.5
60.6%
109W–71L · 54.7% of games
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 41.1% of games
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 58.3% of games
6.0mixed
85.3%
29W–5L · 65.1% of games
6.5mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 56.9% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
188 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
136 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
131 matches
#1 Singles
3%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
14 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer