Teams

Sports Mall-Knowlton/Lake

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

20 players · average NTRP 3.46 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-02vs Ladies in BlackLost 01
L#2 SinglesTiffany Ujifusa vs Melissa Pennock4-6, 2-6
2026-05-26vs PC MARC-Alexander/WeiseWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Ujifusa / Rachel Mills vs Michele Hart / Megan Alexander7-5, 7-5
2026-05-19vs Cottonwood Club-Winson/SummerhaysSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetty Peterson / Carolee Romney vs Dawn Farrell / Heather Sliwa6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanna Miller / Traci Wood vs Rebecca England / Alison Pearce6-0, 6-4
2026-05-12vs Liberty Park-Creamer/WeckerWon 20
W#2 SinglesTraci Wood vs Allison Christenson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Knight / Betty Peterson vs Erin Massey / MacY Bell6-1, 6-1
2026-04-28Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTraci Wood vs Michelle Taylor2-6, 4-6
2026-04-21vs SunPro-Thorpe/ChamberlainWon 10
W#1 DoublesTraci Wood / Danna Miller vs Corinne Wudel / Haley Cook6-0, 6-0
2026-04-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTraci Wood vs Ashlee Chappell2-6, 2-6
2026-04-07vs PC MARC-Alexander/WeiseLost 01
L#3 DoublesDanna Miller / Betty Peterson vs Samantha Levin / Cathy Siegal2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Britany Egan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Angelica Urquia
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.38
Rachel Mills
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.34
Tiffany Ujifusa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Debra Knowlton
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Traci Wood
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.25
Carolee Romney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Beames
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.21
Rebecca Myers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.21
Yoko Walljasper
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.18
Kathryn Tagge
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.16
Betty Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Stacy Criddle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Claudine Finlay
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristel Affleck
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Danna Miller
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Holmstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.85
Kaitlyn Willmore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Shauna Lake
published
Susan Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Beames + Rebecca Myers4163% games+13.0% vs expected
Carolee Romney + Traci Wood2362% games+11.5% vs expected
Rebecca Myers + Angelica Urquia8167% games+10.3% vs expected
Danna Miller + Traci Wood12261% games+9.5% vs expected
Debra Knowlton + Britany Egan6359% games+5.1% vs expected
Kristel Affleck + Debra Knowlton4452% games+4.3% vs expected
Kimberly Holmstrom + Stacy Criddle4154% games+3.8% vs expected
Stacy Criddle + Yoko Walljasper5163% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Britany Egan
198W–108L career · type A · 14 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Angelica Urquia
53W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Rachel Mills
72W–103L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Tiffany Ujifusa
68W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Debra Knowlton
170W–137L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Traci Wood
37W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carolee Romney
134W–164L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Beames
158W–139L career · 10 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Rebecca Myers
110W–41L career · 10 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Yoko Walljasper
308W–196L career · 13 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kathryn Tagge
52W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Stacy Criddle
154W–118L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Claudine Finlay
195W–193L career · 7 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–115L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Danna Miller
108W–117L career · 7 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Kimberly Holmstrom
49W–73L career · 8 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Kaitlyn Willmore
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Shauna Lake
134W–131L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Knight
34W–73L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.