Teams

Liberty Park-Creamer/Wecker

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-02vs PC MARC-Alexander/WeiseLost 02
L#1 DoublesMindy Christensen / Melissa Ford vs Lori Pfeiffer / Michele Hart2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Christenson / Sara Green vs Catherine Clark / Julie Walker2-6, 4-6
2026-05-26Split 11
L#2 DoublesMindy Christensen / Lindsey Little vs Dawn Farrell / Rebecca England5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAllison Christenson vs Sara Turley6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-12vs Sports Mall-Knowlton/LakeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Janis Turley vs Debra Knowlton / Lisa Beames6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAllison Christenson vs Traci Wood4-6, 1-6
2026-05-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJanis Turley vs Tamsin Danis4-6, 6-7
2026-04-28Won 21
L#2 DoublesMelissa Ford / Mindy Christensen vs Cari Cardall / Drew Rucker7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesInga Nelson vs Christa Orozco6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Hall / Lindsey Little vs Kimberly Lee / Celeste Livingston6-4, 7-5
2026-04-21vs Ladies in BlackLost 02
L#1 DoublesMindy Christensen / Melissa Ford vs Amy Teemant / Ashlee Chappell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Christenson vs Angela Woods / Kelli Lowell4-6, 4-6
2026-04-14vs PC MARC-Alexander/WeiseLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Christenson / Inga Nelson vs Alice Moe / Tessa Weise6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-07Won 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Christenson / Melissa Ford vs Krissie Summerhays / Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLindsey Little / Allison Kendell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Janis Turley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allison Kendell
published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Allison Christenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lindsey Little
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Inga Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Okland
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.03
Mindy Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Melissa Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Liz Baucom
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.71
Erin Massey
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Anna Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.47
MacY Bell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Julie Hall
published
Sara Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Creamer + Allison Kendell7170% games+5.5% vs expected
Liz Baucom + Erin Massey9461% games+4.6% vs expected
Lindsey Little + Allison Christenson3257% games+3.5% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Kristen Okland513753% games+3.1% vs expected
Mindy Christensen + Melissa Ford284147% games−0.8% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Allison Christenson4351% games−2.5% vs expected
Erin Massey + MacY Bell202048% games−2.8% vs expected
Inga Nelson + Allison Christenson11951% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janis Turley
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.47
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Allison Kendell
74W–56L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 11 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 12 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Allison Christenson
94W–79L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lindsey Little
30W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristen Okland
79W–74L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Mindy Christensen
93W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Melissa Ford
108W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Liz Baucom
72W–55L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Erin Massey
61W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anna Pearce
53W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
MacY Bell
35W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
Julie Hall
39W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Green
32W–76L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.