← Search

Staci Dansie

SALT LAKE CITY, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 50W–155L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Staci Dansie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-09-02 · SLTHC Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Paula Gause championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karla Block
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mariam Azin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Midyett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Favila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 55% of games
3.0
17.4%
24W–114L · 36.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games
5.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.3% of games
6.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
54 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe