Teams

SLTHC- Dansie

2026 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 6.0 18 & over

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-05vs LP-The Better HalfLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Matz / Michael Keough vs Una Pett / David Hadley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPat Williams / Thomas Mecham vs Linda Lasater / Nigel Munasque6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStaci Dansie / Michael Fordham vs Mark Wood / Deeksha Rao0-6, 1-6
2026-05-29vs South JordanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Byington / Chuck Maggelet vs Brandon Reese / Steph Callie6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Mecham / Karla Block vs Robb Reinhold / Corina Nabaum6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Dansie / Staci Dansie vs Travis Henderson / Kiera Henderson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-15vs Utah/Torres/Mixed18&Over/6.0XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Leatham / Brian Smith vs Hailey Mann / Nick Arismendi0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPat Williams / Thomas Mecham vs Elaine Day / Daniel Chase6-4, 6-4
2026-05-08vs Lehi- McGill/SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Matz / Michael Keough vs Tanner Smith / Kayla Cook3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPat Williams / Thomas Mecham vs Savannah McGill / Jason Woodward1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Byington / Chuck Maggelet vs Kevin Peterson / Angela Smith1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-01vs Lombardi PartyLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Matz / Michael Keough vs Nathan Mortensen / Marci Mortensen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Leatham / Brian Smith vs Dallin Sheldon / Rachael Gilmore4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPat Williams / Michael Fordham vs Eric Forbush / Paige Carsey4-6, 4-6
2026-04-24vs LP- ATPLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Matz / Michael Keough vs Alisa Kesler / Steve Rogers4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPat Williams / Thomas Mecham vs Alyssa de St. Jeor / Grant Coleman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStaci Dansie / John Dansie vs Wendy Conrad / Craig Chytraus2-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs OAC-MI6Lost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Mecham / Pat Williams vs Jason Wessman / Amanda Wessman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Dansie / Staci Dansie vs Jeff Beckstead / Cicily Beckstead3-6, 3-6
2026-04-03vs South JordanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Byington / Chuck Maggelet vs Abraham Weiner / Grace Shanks6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Leatham / Thomas Mecham vs Travis Henderson / Kiera Henderson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKarla Block / Michael Fordham vs Robb Reinhold / Corina Nabaum7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · mixed 6.0 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Torres/Mixed18&Over/6.0X802139144
2Lombardi Party62141021171
3Lehi- McGill/Smith44101430224
4OAC-MI635111327204
5LP-The Better Half2681635235
6SLTHC- Dansie2671736240
7South Jordan1781638247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Linda Byington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Nicole Leatham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Thomas Mecham
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.88
Nancy Matz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Michael Keough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Staci Dansie
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Karla Block
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
Pat Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.38
John Dansie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Michael Fordham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Chuck Maggelet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Byington + Chuck Maggelet3448% games+0.7% vs expected
John Dansie + Staci Dansie11132% games−8.6% vs expected
Nancy Matz + Michael Keough8751% gamesnot enough data
Pat Williams + Thomas Mecham2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Byington
72W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Nicole Leatham
106W–119L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Thomas Mecham
21W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Nancy Matz
48W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Michael Keough
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Staci Dansie
50W–154L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Pat Williams
20W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
John Dansie
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Michael Fordham
20W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Chuck Maggelet
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.