← Search

Karen Yocum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Coalville, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 103W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history171 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-04 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · Park City Boom · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Park City Boom · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Rush championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-19 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-09-05 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Bedell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-25 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-15 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Rush
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-07 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Moe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 56.3% of games
3.5
50%
27W–27L · 50% of games
6.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.8% of games
7.0
69.1%
47W–21L · 59.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Singles
11%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King