← Search

Deborah Warner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BOUNTIFUL, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-18 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bleecker Springs
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-11 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Larkin
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Anderson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · Drop Shot Divas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynette Wills
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · Fabulous 65s · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with AnnMarie Chadwick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-05 · Fabulous 65s · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacki Joseph
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-22 · Fabulous 65s · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with AnnMarie Chadwick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-09-25 · Liberty Park Tennis-Larkin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaye Moulding
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-13 · Liberty Park Tennis-Larkin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilee Cracroft
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-08-03 · Liberty Park Tennis-Larkin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yaeko Bryner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2024-06-24 · Liberty Park Tennis-Stoddard/Larkin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sparrer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-17 · Liberty Park Tennis-Stoddard/Larkin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Stoddard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.8% of games
7.0
50%
25W–25L · 48.4% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe