← Search

Jan Broadbent

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 24W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history73 matches
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Green championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Green championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Miya
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Fuhrman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Fuhrman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Larkin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Staley
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Trentman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Staley
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-30 · Cottonwood Club-Briesacher · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Celia Steele
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
17.9%
5W–23L · 41.4% of games
7.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.0
25%
6W–18L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe