← Search

Kaye Moulding

Ogden, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 46W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kaye Moulding to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shana Overton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jane Swalberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shana Overton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with KayeLynn BASTIAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Swalberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Harman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Harman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Harman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
3.5
32.1%
34W–72L · 43.1% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
7.0
10.8%
4W–33L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#2 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal