← Search

Amy Gillespie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Layton, UT
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
29 matches · 12W–17L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Mcdonald
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Coleman
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Swalberg
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Mcdonald
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Coleman
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaye Moulding
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · ACE-Coleman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Lowe
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · ACE-Coleman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Coleman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · ACE-Coleman · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-08 · ACE-Coleman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackee Belnap
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-12 · Ace Athletics-Gillespie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Austin Aguinaga mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-05 · Ace Athletics-Gillespie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Austin Aguinaga mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert