← Search

Shana Overton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park City, UT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 44W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history86 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Stone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Perry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
Default
2026-10-05 · Stone · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Perry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-21 · Stone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Perry
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-09-14 · Stone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Ann Koson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · Ageless Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaye Moulding
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Stone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Ann Koson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-28 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaye Moulding
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-20 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Travers
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yaeko Bryner
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-06 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenzie Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-08-16 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-06-05 · Park City MARC-Leigh/Tomczyk · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 48.6% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 63.6% of games
7.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams