← Search

Becky Hall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmington, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
361 matches · 192W–169L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history361 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Liberty Park-Leishman/Adams · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · Liberty Park-Leishman/Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · Park City Boom · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Mclevish
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-04 · Park City Boom · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Vickroy
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Nancy Nelson / Betty Reed
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharree Olsen championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
Jane Doe / Diane Welch
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renae Brooks championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renae Brooks
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-08-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renae Brooks
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renae Brooks
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-09 · Liberty Park Tennis-Sassy Sisters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-06-02 · Liberty Park Tennis-Sassy Sisters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 55.9% of games
3.5
52%
102W–94L · 51.4% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
54.2%
26W–22L · 53.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 34.9% of games
6.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 40.5% of games
6.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
74 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
15 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
13 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal