← Search

Mark Adams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bountiful, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
284 matches · 131W–153L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history284 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Liberty Park-Leishman/Adams · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · Liberty Park-Leishman/Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Default
2026-10-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Son
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
Default
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Endhi Visser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-29 · Eccles- Higgs/Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brent Higgs championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-29 · Eccles- Higgs/Schaefer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-28 · Eccles- Higgs/Schaefer · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-28 · Eccles- Higgs/Schaefer · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Bolster/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Marz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Bolster/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Bolster
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
43.1%
50W–66L · 49% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 60% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.5% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
29.7%
11W–26L · 43.8% of games
7.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
60 matches
Singles
20%
56 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams