Teams

Ogden-Cox/Harvey

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-27vs ACE-ColemanWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelanie Decker / Kaye Moulding vs Stephanie Coleman / Paulette Bierwolf4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCassandra Peacock vs Melanie McEntire6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVicki Cox / Tricia Buss vs Lisa Crandall / Shelly Ripplinger6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCicily Beckstead / Sally Cantwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-20Won 30
W#2 DoublesKaye Moulding / Sally Cantwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCicily Beckstead vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Melanie Decker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-13vs Utah/Nebeker/18&Over/3.0WLost 04
L#1 SinglesCassandra Peacock vs Jamie Sorensen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Cox / Erin Moore vs Jinqiu Zhang / Carina Lambert0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSally Cantwell vs Annie Lindsley0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Decker / Kaye Moulding vs Laura Espinosa / Tiffany VandenAkker0-6, 2-6
2026-05-06Split 22
W#1 SinglesCassandra Peacock vs Lisa Harrison6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErin Moore / Kaye Moulding vs Brittany Pope / Holly Ricker2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCicily Beckstead vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSally Cantwell / Tricia Buss vs Alison Barber / Jamie Tate6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-29vs Ivory Ridge RacquettesLost 02
L#1 SinglesErin Moore vs Kristi Winder2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCassandra Peacock / Melanie Decker vs Paulette Santiago / Kylie Woodley2-6, 0-6
2026-04-22vs Wasatch High School-Davis/WattsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCicily Beckstead / Erin Moore vs Chelsea Watts / Chelsie Otteson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Melanie Decker vs Crystal Nielsen / Kathey Maxfield1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-15vs SunPro-Lucky ShotsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCassandra Peacock vs Heidi Farner6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErin Moore vs Nicole Collins6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Melanie Decker vs Megan Cochran / Stacy Nadauld2-6, 3-6
2026-04-08vs ACE-ColemanLost 03
L#1 SinglesCassandra Peacock vs Amy Lowe3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVicki Cox / Erin Moore vs Stephanie Coleman / Paulette Bierwolf3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCicily Beckstead vs Elizabeth McCooey4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Kelti Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Jamison Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.70
Kaye Moulding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Tricia Buss
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.66
Erin Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.56
LISA PERMENTER
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.56
Cassandra Peacock
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.42
Cicily Beckstead
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.37
Vicki Cox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.29
Sally Cantwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Sharon Roghaar
published
Wendy Johnstun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LISA PERMENTER + Tricia Buss4354% games+8.1% vs expected
Kelti Palmer + Jamison Harvey15558% games+7.4% vs expected
Tricia Buss + Kelti Palmer11857% games+6.3% vs expected
Sally Cantwell + Kelti Palmer6352% games+4.7% vs expected
LISA PERMENTER + Erin Moore1644% games−1.3% vs expected
Sally Cantwell + Tricia Buss4844% games−2.3% vs expected
Wendy Johnstun + Vicki Cox71245% games−2.6% vs expected
Tricia Buss + Cicily Beckstead0525% games−7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelti Palmer
65W–42L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Jamison Harvey
49W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Kaye Moulding
45W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Tricia Buss
43W–55L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Erin Moore
11W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
LISA PERMENTER
72W–124L career · 8 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Cassandra Peacock
4W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.56
2.5
Cicily Beckstead
37W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 6 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Vicki Cox
35W–118L career · 5 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37
2.5
Sally Cantwell
40W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Sharon Roghaar
11W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Johnstun
46W–75L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.