← Search

Betsy Ostrander

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 88W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Betsy Ostrander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
Casey Patrick / Juliet Hanson
2026-08-28 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Ostrander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · SM- I'd Hit That · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Ostrander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · SM- I'd Hit That · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Ostrander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candace Haroldsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie DeLong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Callister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Laurie THOMSON / Susan Knust
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Callister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Greg Ostrander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Lexi Farr / Julie Black
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Mckenna Kimball championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Smathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Leatham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 62.3% of games
3.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 55.8% of games
3.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 73.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer