Teams

SLT-Sweet/Smathers

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.18 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-26vs Cottonwood Club-AnnunziataLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Murphy / Charlene Case vs Michelle Cutler / Janice Stokes-Burns2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-07vs Cottonwood Club-AnnunziataLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiana Vogel / Charlene Case vs Beata Kieffer / Kumru Uruk6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC MARC-Alexander/Weise71301025268
2SLT-Sweet/Smathers61221332294
3Sports Mall Baseline Babes62251534300
4Ladies in Black44221840335
5PC MARC-Krueger/Siano34181740316
6Wasatch Hills For The Glory35182250388
7SLTHC Spring Chicks26132760413
8Wasatch High School-Jonston/Jones16112451328
9Ace-Harman/Swalberg16122352369

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ellie Jacobs
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Lindsay Trevino
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Paige Smathers
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.27
Betsy Ostrander
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Gabriella Romney
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Kellner
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.10
Lauren Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Madison Myer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Nicole Leatham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Candace Haroldsen
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.99
Holly Goulding
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.88
Charlene Case
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Brittany Pope
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.81
Mckenna Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Diana Vogel
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Smathers + Candace Haroldsen13175% games+19.7% vs expected
Paige Smathers + Lindsay Trevino4161% games+9.0% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Betsy Ostrander22961% games+8.3% vs expected
Candace Haroldsen + Diana Vogel1437% games−14.2% vs expected
Candace Haroldsen + Madison Myer134 matchesnot enough data
Gabriella Romney + Meghan Kellner314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Murphy + Paige Smathers213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Murphy + Brittany Pope303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellie Jacobs
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Lindsay Trevino
61W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Paige Smathers
40W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Betsy Ostrander
88W–48L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Gabriella Romney
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Meghan Kellner
46W–39L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Sarah Law
82W–85L career · 8 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lauren Murphy
19W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Madison Myer
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Nicole Leatham
106W–119L career · 8 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Candace Haroldsen
86W–59L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Holly Goulding
48W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Charlene Case
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Brittany Pope
36W–29L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Mckenna Kimball
26W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Diana Vogel
52W–77L career · 11 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.