← Search

Candace Haroldsen

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 90W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Candace Haroldsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
L
2026-09-08 · SL Tennis-Sweet/Smathers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Kellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-21 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · SLTHC Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Ostrander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · SLT-Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madison Myer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Janine Nemelka / Cari Cardall
2026-07-11 · SLTHC Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Collette Renstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · SLTHC Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie DeLong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · SLTHC Court Queens · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Leatham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
58.3%
35W–25L · 51.6% of games
3.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57% of games
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.6% of games
5.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 37.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.4% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal