← Search

Cody Haroldsen

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 59W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cody Haroldsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-28 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
Andrew Bliss
2026-08-25 · Haroldsen/Goulding · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Matthew Lee / Bernhard Tauffer
2026-08-04 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Derek Hrabik / Travis Kinnersley
2026-08-01 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · SLTHC- Haroldsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Haroldsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Kris Denos / Matthew Lee
2026-07-07 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Buxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-01 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Derek Hrabik
2026-06-30 · Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/Haroldsen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 58.5% of games
3.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 47% of games
5.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 36.3% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.6% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams