← Search

Ron Kemp

Layton, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 34W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ron Kemp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Christensen/Lay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · Christensen/Lay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · Christensen/Lay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Rutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · Christensen/Lay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Barraclough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Christensen/Lay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Barraclough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Ben Jones / Brian Smith
2026-07-01 · Christensen/Lay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Barraclough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Christensen/Lay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Lay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Nicholas Geer / Christopher Johnson
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Miner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Matthew Lee / Greg Ostrander
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trent Madsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 54.1% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams